Crown Royal presents the `Your Name Here` 400 Qualifying Update

Richmond International Raceway -- 05/1/2010

Author: Jed Henson

Published: Saturday May 1 2010 7:33am

Read all of Jed Henson's articles here


In order to bet on Nascar properly, you need multiple betting accounts, Nascapper.com recommends
BETUS.com and Sportsbook.com.



The Sprint Cup teams got in all the practice they're gonna get for tonight's race at Richmond, and the preliminary action shakes up my rankings a little. Before I get into the handicapping, though, I'll go through some of the factors that affect race predictability.

Tires
According to the Goodyear Tire Notes posted on Jayski.com's Richmond Race Info page, the teams are running the same tire they did at both Richmond races last year. That increases predictability.

The Weather
In my race preview, I noted that the weather forecast called for steady, clear and warm conditions on Friday and Saturday. That forecast has held true so far, and it appears the good, consistent conditions will hold through tonight's race.

The Track
The asphalt is now good and rubbered in, and with no rain so far and no rain on the horizon, it appears the teams will face a consistent level of rubber on the track, which is good for predictability.

On the other hand, the track will undergo a big temperature change from the sunny, hot, daytime temps of yesterday afternoon to the relatively dark, cool temps present tonight during the race. In my preview, I speculated this variation would have a big impact on the cars' race setups (and therefore negatively impact predictability), but now I'm not so sure it will. During Practice 1 yesterday, several drivers gave differing opinions on the temperature change's impact. For example, David Reutimann indicated it will be a big deal, while Tony Stewart said the cooling track will add grip but not affect the cars' balance, meaning a hot-track setup will work on a cool track as well.

The Data
The data accumulated yesterday via the practice and qualifying speed charts has less value than I originally thought it would. Why? The Practice 1 and Practice 2 speed charts mostly reflect which cars were fastest in qualifying trim, and because the teams did not practice after qualifying, we don't have a simple, clear way of gauging which cars are fastest in race trim. The historical data for Richmond is affected by this as well. Bottom line: decreased predictability.

Handicapping Richmond
In my Preview, I rated Kyle Busch just outside my top six, but his performance yesterday vaults him to #1. He was fast in practice, and then went out and claimed the pole, too.

He bumps Jeff Gordon down to #2 in my rankings, but not by much. Gordon was also fast in practice yesterday, and he'll start fourth.

On the other side of the coin, Mark Martin and Denny Hamlin looked much slower yesterday than I anticipated. There's a good chance they both are better in race trim than qualifying trim (compared to their opponents), but that remains a bit of an unknown, so I'm bumping them down out of my top five.

Here's my updated ranking, including the best odds I found this morning at five online sportsbooks:

1. Kyle Busch (4-1 at The Greek, Bodog, and WSEX);
2. Jeff Gordon (8.5-1 at The Greek);
3. Ryan Newman (25-1 at The Greek, Bodog, Linesmaker, BetUS, and WSEX);
4. Jimmie Johnson (6-1 at Bodog, Linesmaker, and BetUS);
5. Kevin Harvick (12-1 at all five sportsbooks);

I don't think betting Busch at 4-1 gets any value. Gordon is borderline at 8.5-1, and I love Newman at 25-1. Nein to Johnson at 6-1, and I'm leaning away from Harvick at 12-1.

Jed Henson publishes the blog NASCARPredict.com. He participates in the Nascapper forums and Free NASCAR Picks Monitor under the name Tucker19.

Comment on this article.

(255 chars max)
Username:
(No HTML)

Captcha: